• Support PDP
  • About Us
  • Wild Prairie Dogs
  • City Prairie Dogs
  • Volunteer
  • Shop
  • History
  • PDP Documentation
  • Contact PDP

Prairie Dog Pals

Dedicated to the Preservation of Prairie Dogs and their Habitat

IMVAMUNE ® and ACAM2000 ® Provide Different Protection against Disease When Administered Postexposure in an Intranasal Monkeypox Challenge Prairie Dog Model

July 26, 2020 by PDP

LinkedIn0
Twitter0
Facebook0
Google+0
Pinterest0

Abstract

The protection provided by smallpox vaccines when used after exposure to Orthopoxviruses is poorly understood. Postexposu re administration of 1st generation smallpox vaccines was effective during eradication. However, historical epidemiological reports and animal studies on postexposure vaccination are difficult to extrapolate to today’s populations, and 2nd and 3rd generation vaccines, developed after eradication, have not been widely tested in postexposure vaccination scenarios. In addition to concerns about preparedness for a potential malevolent reintroduction of variola virus, humans are becoming increasingly exposed to naturally occurring zoonotic orthopoxviruses and, following these exposures, disease severity is worse in individuals who never received smallpox vaccination. This study investigated whether postexposure vaccination of prairie dogs with 2nd and 3rd generation smallpox vaccines was protective against monkeypox disease in four exposure scenarios. We infected animals with monkeypox virus at doses of 104 pfu (2× LD50) or 106 pfu (170× LD50) and vaccinated the animals with IMVAMUNE® or ACAM2000® either 1 or 3 days after challenge. Our results indicated that postexposure vaccination protected the animals to some degree from the 2× LD50, but not the 170× LD5 challenge. In the 2× LD50 challenge, we also observed that administration of vaccine at 1 day was more effective than administration at 3 days postexposure for IMVAMUNE®, but ACAM2000® was similarly effective at either postexposure vaccination time-point. The effects of postexposure vaccination and correlations with survival of total and neutralizing antibody responses, protein targets, take formation, weight loss, rash burden, and viral DNA are also presented.

M Shannon Keckler  1   2 , Johanna S Salzer  1   3 , Nishi Patel  1   4 , Michael B Townsend  1 , Yoshinori J Nakazawa  1 , Jeffrey B Doty  1 , Nadia F Gallardo-Romero  1 , Panayampalli S Satheshkumar  1 , Darin S Carroll  1   5 , Kevin L Karem  1   6 , Inger K Damon  1
Affiliations
  • PMID: 32698399
  • DOI: 10.3390/vaccines8030396
Email this page
Print Friendly

News

Donate Now
Tweets by @CynomysRex

Categories

  • Conservation
  • Donate
  • Fun
  • How You Can Help
  • Information about Prairie Dogs
  • News
  • PDP Operations
  • Shop
  • Wildlife

Tags

artificial burrows behavior black-footed ferret black-tailed prairie dogs breeding Burrowing Owls burrows cage caps colonies Conservation disease ecology Endangered Species Act events feeding flushing fundraising gophers Gunnison habitat handouts hantavirus hibernation humane pest control keystone species landscape design language newsletter outreach owls photos plague poison Prairie Dog Coalition Prairie Dog Day predators rabies relocation Sevilleta shooting squirrels trapping videos volunteer white-tailed prairie dogs

Links

  • Albuquerque Pet Memorial Service
  • Animal Protection New Mexico
  • Animal Protection Voters
  • Bosque Farm Relocation Project
  • Great Plains Restoration Council
  • Midwest Prairie Dog Shelter
  • New Mexico House Rabbit Society
  • New Mexico Wilderness Alliance
  • Pathways: Wildlife Corridors of NM
  • Prairie Dog Coalition
  • Southwest Veterinary Medical Center
  • VCA Veterinary Hospital
  • Wild Earth Guardians

© Copyright 2015 PrairieDogPals.org | Help a Prairie Dog Today!